 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 April 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Issues with sources
editThe first two references are copies of the same ... press release? And the link titled "Kodak Article" is the same EE Times article. The DBPedia Germany link barely mentions AllegroGraph and is not really significant coverage. The Pfizer article is behind a paygate; while I did get a quick look at it the first time I loaded the page, I could not determine if the coverage discussed the subject enough to be considered supportive of notability.
The rest of the links simply go to corporations' pages, and do not really support the article at all. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
The article is poorly sourced and of overall low quality, but that's a rationale for improvement, not deletion. AllegroGraph is notable and relevant in the Semantic Web community. Google Scholar returns a handy list of good references. Sboucher (talk) 23:06, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
COI
editI've added {{coi}} because the author (Craig Norvell) is Franz's Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing. That in itself is not necessarily a problem, but there are verifiability issues, no assertion of notability, etc. that need to be fixed. -- samj inout 10:39, 16 April 2010 (UTC)