Talk:Allen v. City of Oakland

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Careful, Careful / POV-Check

edit

So, we have a complex case here. 119 presumably-living plaintiffs on one side that succeeded in civil rights legislation. On the other side, 3 living people who were fired from the police force but not guilty after two different juries deadlocked / acquitted. So, we need to be very careful about BLP issues. --HectorMoffet (talk) 01:34, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

And in keeping with that, I put up pov-check on myself for the moment. --HectorMoffet (talk) 01:34, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Seems Neutral to me — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.163.192.243 (talk) 03:24, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Allen v. City of Oakland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)Reply