Talk:Allison Harvard

Nous Model Management

On the Tyra Show, Allison was offered a contract with Nous Model Management, but she just said that she might accept it. It shouldn't be listed as her agency unless there is a source that says that she actually did accept it. 24.6.209.4 (talk) 22:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

I Definately agree, it needs to be confirmed before added - there have also been rumours that she is also signed to elite models but i think we should wait until she appears on their site or at least on one of her offical sites. LuvLei(talk) 08:37, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Also, as short as it was, I know she got signed once though I think she might have ended the representation already. If you go to the site she's no longer on the list of represented models under women. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.10.116 (talk) 15:53, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Celia

Do you think that there should be any mention of the friendship Allison made with Celia Ammerman (as well as Kortnie Coles) on Top Model? It featured frequently on Top Model, so it might be nice to make some mention of it. :) (Kyleofark (talk) 18:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC))

this isn't an article about AMTM cycle 12. Adding a lot of details about the show, doesn't belong. ... MistyWillows ^talk 22:01, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

I think so as well. They are still good friends outside of the show now (on her offical facebook, she stated so). I think it should be documented. Analeigh Tipton is still good friends with marjorie and it is on her personal wikipedia page. (LuvLei (talk) 08:33, 15 May 2009 (UTC))

I agree. There is a whole bunch of stuff on here that does not belong. Same with Teyona (though she has less info). I won't be surprised if it's because of her popularity and Teyona's win over her. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.72.58.171 (talk) 02:40, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

"Original Research" Reverted

Misty, while this section falls under OR, it is also supported by several direct sources (which were referenced on the page). What's the problem? I won't revert until you comment.

I'm not sure if it is entirely an issue of WP:OR, but sourcing "outrage" on blogs/forums is not something I would consider conforming to a WP:BLP, and hence I agree with its removal. In addition, I would say this is more relevant to the show than to the individual. Plastikspork (talk) 16:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

I was applying this statement from WP:OR: "All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors." Since the forums are the primary-source, you did an original analysis. ... MistyWillows ^talk 20:38, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Removal of Internet information

The removal of crucial information, the nomination for deletion, and the constant moronic edits and removals have cemented my leave from this article. Do what you want. Wikipedia, you disappoint me.Antitab (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:12, 20 May 2009 (UTC).

Crucial information? What, that pictures of her circulated on 4chan? Use reliable sources to build the article, not meme sites, blogs and fan wikis. Fences and windows (talk) 17:26, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

• Please stop adding unreliable sources. Fansites, wikis and blogs are not acceptable sources. Fences and windows (talk) 20:35, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Idiots. You moderate a website but require sources in the print media to back up information? So unless something is on a news website (and a 'credible' one at that) its assumed to be lies? 92.30.42.5 (talk) 12:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Please keep your tone professional and assume good faith. The guidelines for reliable information do not require it to be in print, but they do require it to be subject to an editorial process and not a secondary source. For examples, an article on the New York Times website or an online bulletin from the World Health Organization would both be considered acceptable sources. However, a blog written by the subject's friend, a website made by a fan of the subject, or an article in this very encyclopedia would all be considered unreliable sources. 96.252.169.163 (talk) 07:25, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

artist

I don't think notability is established for the subject as an artist. Bus stop (talk) 18:16, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly...only a few of the references are worth considering as establishing notability like the Wired article, but that might not be enough. Every single subject of an article in a published magazine doesn't need its own Wikipedia page. Start the deletion process and let's see if we can reach consensus. 96.252.169.163 (talk) 07:30, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Large, varied interview with Allison 08 Feb 2010.

See http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/fhjpz/by_request_i_was_sent_to_remuda_ranch_when_i_was/ . I'm linking this because it's of use and isn't something from a regular media channel.

birthplace

Allison was born in Houston, Texas at Texas Children's Hospital. She was not born in New Orleans. Her mother is from New Orleans and Allison attended LSU in Baton Rouge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoshi5013 (talk • contribs) 23:19, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

The downside

Why you are write nothing about her camwhoring on 4chan.org? I think it deserves attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.242.76.110 (talk) 22:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

She didn't camwhore. Her photos were posted on 4chan by users who found them on her social network site(s)

inconsistent information

I don't know enough about the subject to correct this. The lead says she is best known for being the winner of ATNM. Later on in the article it says she finished as runner-up. 206.10.158.35 (talk) 00:00, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

That would be vandalism. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:23, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Allison Harvard WeTheUrban.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Allison Harvard WeTheUrban.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 7 April 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Allison Harvard WeTheUrban.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:15, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Photo

I think maybe a new photo should be used for Allison. One that compliments her work. Creep Chan was is a horrible nickname and that photo backs that up. Maybe one of her photoshoot ones.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Allison Harvard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080328125634/http://nousmodels.com/framework.php to http://www.nousmodels.com/framework.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 2 July 2017 (UTC)