 | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 December 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mnepre.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Merge allomothering?
editIs allomothering a mergeable subtopic of alloparenting? Or does someone wish to focus one article on humans and the other on non-human animals? (Or is there something else I'm missing?)
(This is not a formal merge request ... yet. I want to get my facts straight first.) --SoledadKabocha (talk) 06:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
I definitely agree that allomothering could be merged to alloparenting. Conorm33 (talk) 15:42, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Alloparenting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060915032734/http://www.oberlin.edu/faculty/ndarling/transition/group9/efekorean.html to http://www.oberlin.edu/faculty/ndarling/transition/group9/efekorean.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Are not teachers alloparents?
editQUERY: Why would not "alloparenting" include teachers and child-care providers, who in most cases provide, as a team, more hours of parenting contact between adult and child per day, and in many cases per year. "In loco parentis" is a principle of common law by which educators in a secondary boarding school step into the guardianship shoes of the parents. Would this not push the percentage of alloparented children in the U.S. substantially higher? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.104.154.167 (talk) 15:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Suggestions
editI think this article is very good and contains many good examples. I think that because there is a benefits section there should also be a section that talks of the disadvantages of alloparenting. I also think that even more examples are added and that some pictures should be added as well. Kralikr (talk) 17:02, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Planning Edits
editHello Wiki community,
This is just a quick post to let anyone interested know that I am planning some update/edits to this page in the coming weeks. I hope to contribute clear, well-researched and interesting edits to this page, and am open to any feedback or suggestions.
Cheers, Madison246 (talk) 04:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Work needed
editArticle is verbose and unclear, e.g. a section talks about "this study" without naming it; sections use names or acronyms, dive into sudden detail, and so on. The images all seem decorative - not one is definitively about alloparenting, for instance. Substantial work is needed to rewrite most of the article to explain the topic to someone who doesn't actually know it already and who wants a quick overview of the topic. (The old advice is to imagine your reader is a geologist.) Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
2+ years later and this is mostly still true. The language is stilted, and it just doesn't read like a Wikipedia article. Needs work. Sorry I'm not able to do it myself at this point. Sti11w4ter (talk) 20:13, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Benefit to the species
editThere is a genetic advantage for the species as a whole if individuals without offspring alloparent. The same applies to orphans[1]. A neo-darwinian perspective. Species proliferation trumps individual lives. Tradimus (talk) 01:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ The Evolution of Alloparental Care and Adoption in Mammals and Birds. Marianne L. Riedman. The Quarterly Review of Biology. Vol. 57, No. 4 (Dec., 1982), pp. 405-435 (31 pages). Published By: The University of Chicago Press
Wiki Education assignment: Physiological Ecology of Animals
edit This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2023 and 28 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Useeikick (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Useeikick (talk) 19:27, 20 March 2023 (UTC)