Talk:Allow Me (Portland, Oregon)/Archive 1

Sources

• http://racc.org/public-art/search/?recid=1347.287

--Another Believer _(Talk) 20:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

• http://www.philadelphiaweekly.com/news-and-opinion/statue_of_limitations-38397694.html

--Another Believer _(Talk) 01:15, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

• http://siris-artinventories.si.edu/ipac20/ipac.jsp?&profile=all&source=~!siartinventories&uri=full=3100001~!327967~!0#focus

--Another Believer _(Talk) 22:48, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

• http://siris-artinventories.si.edu/ipac20/ipac.jsp?session=14118431M2Y5O.1669&profile=ariall&uri=link=3100009~!1494813~!3100001~!3100002&aspect=Browse&menu=search&ri=17&source=~!siartinventories&term=Allow+Me%2C&index=ALTIT ----Another Believer _(Talk) 18:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Allow Me (Portland, Oregon)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bobamnertiopsis (talk · contribs) 03:31, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Good job! This is a very good article, certainly one worthy of GA status. My one suggestion: provide some context for the tin can Allow Me seems to be holding in the second image. Otherwise, you get a pass! Congrats! BobAmnertiopsis∴_ChatMe! 03:31, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing the article. The image name contains "Tin Squibbles", but I am not sure what this refers to, hence why I omitted details from the caption. --Another Believer _(Talk) 23:21, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Allow Me (Portland, Oregon). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111164436/http://www.thesquarepdx.org/design_features.htm to http://www.thesquarepdx.org/design_features.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Allow Me (Portland, Oregon). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140106223105/http://www.thesquarepdx.org/pdf/PCS-Annual-Report-2012.pdf to http://www.thesquarepdx.org/pdf/PCS-Annual-Report-2012.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140106230720/http://www.oregonbusiness.com/articles/31-december-2007/626-the-oregon-philanthropy-awards to http://www.oregonbusiness.com/articles/31-december-2007/626-the-oregon-philanthropy-awards

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)