This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. |
Group 10
editReview 1
editUntitled
editThis page looks really good. The chembox has a lot of information and so does the rest of the page. Actually, the only issue you might want to work on is the large blank part of the 'Reactions' section. Although it probably won't lose points, it just looks a little awkward. Ktmass (talk) 01:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Review 2
editThere is a lot of good information on this page. The only thing I would say that in your uses section maybe you want to explain what a cross-linking agent is. The section only has one sentence so I feel like you should add to it or put that in a different section. Also, you could add a 3D picture of your compound. Everything else looks good though. Mpate52 (talk) 01:25, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Review 3
editThis page is well done with a lot of information and details on your compound. The chembox is plentiful and has a lot of parts to it. I really like the diagram in the Reactions section. Maybe you can combine the smaller sections because they seem almost random if there's not a lot of information in the smaller parts. You could also expand them to add more explanation in these sections. I'd suggest just putting Uses in the general description of your compound since both of these sections are pretty short. Otherwise, it looks really good. smunoz (talk Smunoz2 (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Review 4
editThis page provides a sufficient amount of information. The chembox is well made as well. You might want to make sure the empty white space before the reaction diagram is removed and edited. Also, when including a hazard section in your page, you want to make sure you are not overlapping information from your chembox. Overall, your going down the right direction. (Jcyeung2 (talk) 05:53, 2 November 2012 (UTC))