This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cephalopods, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CephalopodsWikipedia:WikiProject CephalopodsTemplate:WikiProject CephalopodsCephalopods articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
FYI, it's the Kingdom Animalia, not Kingdom Animal as directed from [[Animal|ia]]. This also goes for Phylum Mollusca, not Mollusc, and Class Cephalopoda, not Cephalopod. Animal, mollusc, and cephalopod are not specific terms with no specification of taxonomic rank. A dog is and animal, an owl is an animal, and so is a sea star and animal, but then mammals are animals, reptiles are animals and so are insects animals. So on and so forth. On the other hand it should be alright to refer informally to the animal kingdom, molluscan phylum, or cephalopod class.
J.H.McDonnell (talk) 18:33, 15 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Oh look, i clicked your blue linked Animalia, Mollusca, and Cephalopoda. Where did I end up? At Animal, Mollusc, and Cephalopod. There is NO point to forcing people though redirect pages. People are NOT going to see if the linked term is Animaila or animal, they are only going to see a totally pointless redirect page that their computer has to move through to get to the final destination.--Kevmin§22:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
