The article was assessed as Start-Class on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale.

edit

Here's why:

  • Coverage: The article provides a basic plot summary, some publication history, and critical commentary, but it lacks depth regarding character analysis, themes, and a comprehensive exploration of the book’s reception.
  • References: It includes several reliable references, but the citations could be expanded or diversified to include more contemporary analysis.
  • Structure: The structure is clear, with sections on the plot, criticism, and publication history. However, more sections could be added for deeper analysis.
  • Quality of Writing: The writing is clear, though further refinement could improve flow and readability.
  • Supporting Materials: The article includes an infobox, which is helpful, but additional media (such as cover images or links to relevant scholarly discussions) could enhance the article.

Bookleo (talk) 03:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply