Talk:Alpina/Archives/2015

TÜV?

You guys got sth seriously wrong here - it´s not the TÜV that recognizes automobile manufacturers in Germany, it´s the KBA, the Kraftfahrtbundesamt. 46.114.9.175 (talk) 08:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Corrected. Thank you. NemesisIII (talk) 18:55, 10 February 2015 (UTC).

About the logo

(Answer to this comment, I began writing the following message while the deleted comment was still there)

Excuse me for my bad English. This logo doesn't show what an actual Alpina car is. This is not representative of a true Alpina car. Even if the roundel looks like an original, it is probably not. Would you illustrate the article of Sony or Apple with the picture of counterfeit products even if they look like the original ? No. Moreover there is already the logo at the top of the page. Thus the logo on the car is a also a duplicate and even more so useless because there are too many images in the gallery (Wikipedia:Image use policy#Image galleries).

Here is my explanation about my edit in the gallery : I put the images in chronological order, removed duplicates, put better images, there are finally 5 images less. NemesisIII (talk) 20:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC).

Sorry, I removed my comment because it was responding to a 7-year-old comment. Here is is again: "The company has a logo as shown on its website. The logo just does not replace the BMW roundel on vehicles." This is the logo of the company, which is the subject of this article. I was referring to the logo at the top of the page. If there was an image of a vehicle with the logo where the roundel goes, then it is not representative of their product and should be removed. Bahooka (talk) 20:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Ok, no problem, it is a little misunderstanding then . Good evening. NemesisIII (talk) 22:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC).