This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 3 July 2018 by reviewer L293D (talk·contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This article was at one designation, the Draco nav template used a different one, both of which were catalogue-dependent. I figured if we couldn't figure out which was the usual designation, neither could be common enough to worry about, so I moved it to the new IAU name. — kwami (talk) 07:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Alruba might have been picked by an IAU committee, but nobody has ever heard of it or used it as a name for this star. WP:COMMONNAME applies and Alruba isn't it. Historically, the name was used only on one fairly obscure celestial map, and then as Al Ruba, not Alruba. The star is barely visible to the naked eye, so not present on most ancient maps. There are two or three designations that would be widely recognised for the star, HD 161693 is probably the most common in scientific use over the last 50 years or so. Before that probably the BD designation. Lithopsian (talk) 11:58, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
