This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
Footnote 1 includes a DOI that leads to an entirely different review of the book than the one cited. Are any of the current uses of Footnote 1 meant to be cited to that other review? Nikkimaria (talk) 12:07, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Weird! No, I'll remove it. Also, why do you keep removing the wikidata infobox? I prefer to add metadata there, rather than just in the infobox. If you have any particular reason, I would be curious to hear about it. Jlevi (talk) 12:44, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
It has issues with regards to formatting and overspecificity, and I don't see any associated benefit that would outweigh those concerns. This version is cleaner and includes the missing genre. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Formatting preference seems rather in the eye of the beholder. Further, I intend to add metadata primarily through the wikidata interface for now, and I prefer those modifications show up automatically. Given that I am actively adding content to the page, I would like to keep the infobox as I initially included it for that reason. Once the page is more stable, perhaps we can chat about this matter again. Sound fair? Jlevi (talk) 21:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
