Talk:Alternate truck routes in Pennsylvania

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Kurykh in topic Statement by AfD closing admin

Needs more references

edit

This article needs to tell the reader why there are alternate truck routes in Pennsylvania rather than that they exist. I can see this article failing at AfD because it does not currently demonstrate notability. The answer to why there are alternate truck routes will probably be found in a PennDOT press release, but third-party coverage in a newspaper would be even better. –Fredddie 00:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

PROD declined, planned path forward

edit

I understand the concerns of the person who added the PROD for this article, but before we delete this, we do need to move the information (as they suggested FIRST). Suggest a more nuanced approach, if we DO decide to enact that proposal, a selective merge and then deletion would work. Move the info FIRST, then renominate for PROD after all of that is done. --Jayron32 13:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

I don't see the need to do that as most of the information was copy and pasted from the individual route articles. Dough4872 21:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Let's ensure the information in this article is present in each of the individual route articles before we delete this article.  V 04:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
I agree with that. I am opening to deleting this if someone can go through and make sure we aren't losing any information... --Jayron32 16:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Statement by AfD closing admin

edit

To clarify what the templates on these two pages are trying to say, the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternate truck routes in Pennsylvania requires that the individual sections of this article be merged into their appropriate parent highway articles. --Kurykh (talk) 04:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply