Talk:Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Leonardo Gutierrez?!
One weird user keeps posting that Leonardo Gutierrez is gonna be featured in this movie, but there is absolutely no source whatsoever! Gutierrez is not even an actor, or even in America! Why does he keep doing this?! WikiLubber (talk) 01:52, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Edit: Probably some idiot.....
I know who it was. I just wanna know WHY! WikiLubber (talk) 21:53, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Media
Shouldn't you also be updating upcoming media for example there's gonna be a book out soon-unamed user
Not until everything is cleared. WikiLubber (talk) 13:47, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
P.S Single ladis will be sang by the chipettes in the film-unamed user —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.180.245 (talk) 12:47, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Work on your spelling. It's "Single LadiEs". WikiLubber (talk) 01:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Sorry spelling error-unamed user 8:55, 4 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.180.245 (talk)
You know wats weird that there's clips of a traler that I can't find as in how did they do that!-unamed user 10:35 26 Novemver 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.180.245 (talk) 00:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Edit War over 1 artcile
thereason I put orphan chipmunks in the plot because I wanted it to be more spefic-unamed user —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.180.245 (talk) 13:13, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
It is not necessary. We do not even know for sure they are actual orphans. WikiLubber (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Okay 1 why am I am aruging on the internet when I don't know you and 2. The Chipettes are fictonal orphans-unamed user —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.180.245 (talk • contribs) 13:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
They are not officially orphans. WikiLubber (talk) 13:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
They we're living in a orphange even if possiably their parents abanoed-unmaed user 18:42 3 October 2009 (UTC)
That does not mean they're OFFICIAL orphans, even if they DID live in an orphanage. Besides, they could be living in a forest in the live action film, too, you know, like the Chipmunks did in the first. And I am not a sock puppet (at least not anymore). WikiLubber (talk) 01:00, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- If a reliable source can be given confirming that the Chipettes are orphans, then we may include it. But anyways, it's not a big deal, so just leave it be, there's no reason to argue over something so small and cause an edit war over simply one word. Appearing here probably wouldn't be of best interest ;) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:11, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
she's right we'll call it even beside I admit it i'm 10 years old. I just wanna share my ideas w/ the world :(-unamed user 01:37, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Does not work that way in this website. WikiLubber (talk) 01:44, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- Correction: I'm a he. But anyways, like WikiLubber said, Wikipedia isn't the place for opinions and ideas (at least in articles), but you can always make useful contributions and help out the project with factual content. You made you edition out of good faith, which is great, but continuously reverting other user's edits gets you nowhere. Consider checking out the policies and guidelines if you ever need help. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:50, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
I'm afraid that WikiLubber has decided to protect this article. --TimonandPumbaaFan (talk) 13:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Wait now you belive me?-unamed user 17:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
No, they do not, and they never will. WikiLubber (talk) 20:54, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
I'll take that as a no-unamed user 18:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.180.245 (talk)
I FINALLY GOT PROOF!!!!!!!!!!!-unamed user 15:40, 9 December 2009 [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.102.190.137 (talk)
You call that proof?! That is just speculation. The Chipmunks are officially not orphans (their mother is alive), and neither are the Chipettes (officially)! WikiLubber (talk) 22:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
This is now closed from editing we are now gonna argue about this anymore —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.102.190.137 (talk) 02:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
We are NOT going to argue about this anymore, you mean. WikiLubber (talk) 20:53, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
I HATE YOU!:(-UNAMED USER 19:36 21,December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.102.190.137 (talk)
- 1. Remember to sign your comments.
- 2. "Hate" will get you nowhere. WikiLubber (talk) 16:56, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
The chipettes are on the fictional orpahns list on Wikipedia without proof they are real orphans but I will admit the chipetts parents are never mentioned and as such they are seen as abondoned and may be orphans but we do not have proff they are real orphans.Marchbaby321
Please do not begin a fight. Heavy opinions are not needed. So fighting on this talk palge is really unnecessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.203.134.114 (talk) 05:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Video Game Page
If no one else is going to does anyone mind if I make the VIdeo game page I cannot add images but I or make the boxes but I can start the Video game Page.Marchbaby321
Filming Location
Does anyone know where this film is being shot? The setting looks an awful lot like Wilson Classical High School, and correct me if I'm wrong but I am pretty sure that you can see the school's logo in some scenes throughout the trailers. Comfirmation on this would be a most welcomed piece of information for the article. (Iuio (talk) 10:15, 14 December 2009 (UTC))
What is this doing in the Chipettes section
jack wwooodward is the best init I think it should be deleted there is no reason for it being there Marchbaby321 I got rid of it so never mind.Marchbaby321
Summary
It's wrong. The Chipettes where adopted by Dave, not Claire. And the part that goes "Little does Dave and Toby know, on their very first day at school, the Chipmunks feel like "Chipmunks Out of Water" with all the human students and bullies around.". Is a little weird. I mean Dave doesn't know pretty much anything that's going on, and Toby knows but isn't that helpful. The Chipmunks are fine with the other humans, it's just the bullies that make their school days bad. This whole summary is sorta iffy, but yeah, whatever someone should work on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.211.254.210 (talk) 22:10, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Alvinnnnnn?
I think that there are one too many "N"s in the last word of the plot summary. I move to remove one and only one of them. Thank you soldierx40k (talk) 18:45, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- Leave it be, it's not a big deal if it looks like it has one more n than necessary, really that's just opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Estemshorn (talk • contribs) 02:53, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Mole?
Does anybody know what that mole-thing was that popped out of the sewer towards the end? I thought the Chipmunks and Chippettes were the only anthropomorphic animals in that world. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.115.101.171 (talk) 06:08, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
I was wondering the same thing. I was totally confused by that and I tried to do some research to find out what it is, but i have absolutely no idea who that mole is and why he was even in the movie. - (talk) 11:01, 27 December 2009
It's a gopher not a mole and thats Digger from NASCAR-unamed user 011:08,3 Januray 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.102.190.137 (talk)
Ok. Thanks for clearing that up, that confused the heck out of me. BTW, i added a link to your response that leads to Digger's page. - (talk) 08:56, 03 January 2010
leave it alone
hi don't detele and remove walden media —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.199.79 (talk) 08:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Walden Media had nothing to do with either this or the previous film! WikiLubber (talk) 13:42, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Walden Media
Alvin and The Chipmunks: The Squeakquel was not made by Walden Media nor was the other movie. Until some form of proof is given to state otherwise please refain from editing it in. --Whitefang94 (talk) 15:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Review and reception neutral point of view problems
Too much of this section seems to criticize the film, not based on anything regarding the movie itself, but on the fact that it was successful. A movie has absolutely no control over how successful another movie is. Perhaps AaTC:TS was simply marketed better, etc. This section seems to have serious neutral point of view issues Michaelh2001 (talk) 22:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Hey, do you know the names of the Chipmunks and Chipettes? Because I do not. Please list all six of their names. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.79.11.188 (talk) 00:38, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Sequel
There is no confirmed sequel so I am deleting the section about it. Marchbaby321 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.112.132.176 (talk) 19:01, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions about Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |