Talk:Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel (soundtrack)
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Narutolovehinata5 in topic Did you know nomination
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel was copied or moved into Draft:Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel (soundtrack). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Narutolovehinata5 talk 00:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the soundtrack for Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel mostly contains covers?
- Source: Carpenter, Susan (2009 December 23), https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2009-dec-23-la-et-chipmunks23-2009dec23-story.html
- Reviewed:
Created by 223.178.84.233 (talk). Nominated by TheNuggeteer (talk)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
TheNuggeteer (talk) 08:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC).
- Article is new and long enough, with contents copied from parent article given proper attribution, although technically a mainspace move as opposed to a creation at this point. Despite Earwig's results yielding no copyvio, I found close paraphrasing on the Background section (particularly on the first and second sentences), which could also use some copy edits for clarity and sentence flow; the quoted material may even be paraphrased in Wiki's voice. Hook is mildly interesting and cited both in this page and the article, and no QPQ is required for this is nominator's first stab at DYK. I notice that the article's primary author is actually User:223.178.84.233, not the nominator; I've fixed the proper DYK credits. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 17:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- TheNuggeteer and 223.178.84.233, would either of you be able to fix the concerns above? While TheNuggeteer was able to see the review, they did very little to address the copyvio concerns (diff), in which case I might have to fail this nomination. Please be advised. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 09:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- I read the message, I'm going to try and fix the close wording, I'm not really good on this type of editing, so please ping me if needed. TheNuggeteer (talk) 12:22, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Apologies, but neither a paraphrase nor a copy edit was done on this revision; the sentence structure is barely different from that of the source text. Rejecting this nomination for noncompliance to WP:DYKCITE and WP:DYKTAG. I've tagged the article with the relevant maintenance templates so that a more experienced editor can resolve the issues. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 14:21, 16 June 2024 (UTC)