Talk:Am. Express Co. v. Italian Colors Rest.

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 8 April 2019 by reviewer Barkeep49 (talk · contribs).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Moving this article to American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant.

Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I think this article should be moved to American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant. The use of Bluebook abbreviations in the title that are not widely known (i.e., Am. and Rest.) is probably not ideal, especially when the first word of the article is one such abbreviation. I think we can keep the abbreviation for "Company", since this abbreviation is more widely known than the other two, and is also used in the titles of other articles (e.g., Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona, and General Electric Co. v. Gilbert). Glad Tidings from New York (talk) 00:40, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support – That makes sense to me. Disclaimer: I'm not familiar with the Wikipedia guidelines, if any, for article names about legal cases. — Mudwater^(Talk) 00:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply