Talk:Am ha'aretz

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jewish history

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Judaism

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WP:naming conventions (use English)

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

No mystical or esoteric secret to the fact that "people of the land" "peoples (plural) of the land" and "peoples (plural) of the lands (plural)" mean different things.... lede fixed by English. This article would be a poster-boy for why Wikipedia has a WP:EN guideline in the first place. :( In ictu oculi (talk) 03:29, 30 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

More sources and NPOV

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

POV added because it lacks the more insulting definitions of the term and the intro is poorly written, thus confusing. Also lacks sources. Some sources that can be referenced are:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.35.137 (talk) 18:47, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

This is not a neutrality problem, the article just needs expanding. You could do that. Op47 (talk) 23:26, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic