Talk:Amanita daucipes/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (talk) 08:11, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Issues

Not much needed for this article. Its interesting how ugly or attractive this mushroom can be; the three images look like completely different species. btw, One thing I noticed; the first sentence in the taxonomy section says A. abrupta... is that correct there?-- Rcej (talk) 08:11, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Nope - a result of working on several similar articles simultaneously. Fixed. Sasata (talk) 19:04, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Heh. I've definitely been there :-) Rcej (talk) 01:42, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

The article Amanita daucipes passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass

Thanks for reviewing! Sasata (talk) 03:01, 7 November 2009 (UTC)