Talk:Amanita regalis/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 09:30, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

As we said on Louisiana playgrounds as kids "I got dibs!" (trans: We'll start ASAP)-- Rcej (Robert) - talk 09:30, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Okay... as it turns out, the article had nothing but a few little blips; I took care of them, so I'm just going to pass it. That one doi is pmid-covered, but you can hunt that doi anytime. Non-issue there. btw, I love that you used 'ochraceous'... lol.-- Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Robert. Ochraceous is one of the many mushroom-related descriptive terms that has infiltrated my regular conversation; it's becoming so pervasive that my 5-year old son is picking up some of these words too! Sasata (talk) 16:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

The article Amanita regalis passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass