Talk:Amar la Trama/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 07:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Well written with no errors. I'm impressed with this.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Complies to WP:MOS.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Properly referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   One small thing. The reference for the chart performance should be placed at the chart, and not at the heading of the table. As it's a small thing, I've moved the ref, but it's worth remember for the future.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Complies to WP:NPOV.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Article is stable.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Images all check out.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   All in all, an almost perfect score, with a few minor issues which I have fixed. It is not a requirement, but if you have a music sample, it would be nice to include it. I am confident that the article complies with GA requirements and standards, and am happy to pass this. Well done!