Talk:Amateur telescope making
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
New to Wikipedia
editShould we shift this to amateur telescope making? --Robert Merkel
I am new to wikipedia, but isn't the page already called Amateur telescope making? can you explain? Kurt Eichenberger
- Well, Robert Merkel asked the question back in 2002 July 23, and maybe the article was named differently then and someone did shift it, although I see no name change in the history. -Wikibob | Talk 23:14, 2004 Apr 6 (UTC)
A mirror is nonconductive, so I think it's not possible to "electrically charge" it during aluminization. My understanding is that the atoms just fly straight through the vacuum. I'm going to change the text.
- Could this be a static charge like what will easily form, for example, on plastic objects. This has been my impression, although I am not that familiar with vacuum plating. --212.54.17.234 19:16, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
- it certainly is possible to charge a non-conductive object. the difficulty is getting charge to drain away. this is exactly the situation with the familiar case of "static electricity". apart from rubbing two non-conductors, spraying electrons over a non-conductor will charge it (albeit unevenly). this is why your glass tv screen develops a charge 131.172.99.15 04:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC)snaxalotl
External links cleanup
editI have cleaned up some of the external links and consolidated others. There still may be some cleanup to do namely the links to possible vanity additions and links to telescope building "how-tos". Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not states that among the links to be avoided are (paraphrase) "sites that do not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Featured article". I would interpret this to mean that since Wikipedia is not a "how-to" or an instruction manual (WP:NOT) links to "how-tos" should not be included because they would be beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article. A valid link would be a link to a site about the over all field or history of telescope making, not a site on how to make a telescope. Halfblue 04:35, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
New Page Needed
editThere should be a separate page for "Amateur Telescope Making", the famous series of three books edited by Albert G. Ingalls GHJmover (talk) 08:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
(dark glass is not safe enough, see Arc welding lenses, see Telescope solar lenses)
was added as correction
Please either say nothing, refer to manufacturer instructions, or correctly say it is a special solar lense. Dark glass alone will cause blindness over time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.219.202.186 (talk) 14:30, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Amateur telescope making. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100613085526/http://stellafane.org/history/early/brieft-history.html to http://stellafane.org/history/early/brieft-history.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080723182924/http://www.astronomytelescope.net/sitemap.php to http://www.astronomytelescope.net/sitemap.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090316223225/http://www.atmsite.org/contrib/Ward/history/ to http://www.atmsite.org/contrib/Ward/history/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060520000018/http://www.stellafane.com/history/history4.html to http://www.stellafane.com/history/history4.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)