Talk:Amazon Eve

Lacks True Notability

Any notion of "notability" for this person seems dubious and transitory at best. Sd0410 (talk) 23:53, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Article Not Up to Standards

This article does not meet even the most basic standards for quality, length, or content. This article doesn't even contain real name, birth date, or basic personal history information, for this person. Sd0410 (talk) 23:53, 10 April 2010 (UTC).

As of now this does give her real name and date of birth. What other basic personal history information is needed? User:Greenwayfriend 21:40, 19 October 2013 (ET).

A correct date of birth which I can validate would be great. Where do I send my validation? There are her own Facebook posts that corroborate August 6. 1967 as well as a birthday party video on YouTube where she acknowledges her birthday. The 1979 date is a personally acknowledged date of her own accord where she accepted herself as female. She is 52 years old, not 40. If you've ever seen her aged face in person you would know that as well.

Category removed

The category I removed is not supported by the article or any sources therein and as such violated WP:BLP. Probable vandalism. 68.146.81.123 (talk) 13:11, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

I removed the LGBT tag, which appeared to have arrived along with the unjustified transgender label, since I could find nothing to back it up. 69.110.145.209 (talk) 17:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Picture?

Are there any requests of a picture being added to this page? I would make the article more interesting.Meatsgains (talk) 23:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Insertion of unreferenced info

Somone keeps adding controversial information about this person without giving any reliable sources. Please note that this is a biography of a living person and any information that affects the person's image will need sourcing. Youtube is not a reliable source. DHN (talk) 00:28, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Link to Aftonbladet, FN 7

The current reference 7 is to a Swedish language article. The English language articles is at http://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/article18733687.ab and makes no reference to Eve having been a man. Please correct the text and citation.

Also, I am no longer getting notices when the page itself is changed. I checked "Watch this page." Possibly this relates to the suspension and later restoration of this account. Maybe I did something wrong or there is a problem at the Wikipedia end. Regardless, any help will be appreciate. Greenwayfriend (talk) 02:05, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your article "Erika: ”Skarsgård always treated me as a woman”" is not the same as the other English article, Supermodel Erika: ”I used to be called William”.--Auric talk 02:15, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

I have followed the hyperlink you provided and from what I can tell, it does not say, "was born a man." Greenwayfriend (talk) 02:24, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Not as such. How do you explain ”Transitioned from male to female in 2004”?--Auric talk 02:42, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

When she was born, the biology of Eve's brain was female (who), but the biology of her body was male (what). She first identified the discrepancy when she was about 3 years old. It was a great source of misery for her and those around her. About ten years ago she went through transition so that how she presents is aligned with who she is. She was never a man. Greenwayfriend (talk) 03:03, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

But her body was born male, correct?--Auric talk 03:36, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

There is nothing in the article that supports the statements that Eve was a man or that she changed from man to woman. Such statements are false and hurtful. I have to figure out how to get someone who is sensitive to these issues to assist. The topic is complex and I appreciate that you are not aware. There is tons of literature out there, but I am not expecting you to become an expert in this field.(Oops. I forgot to sign in.) Greenwayfriend (talk) 12:17, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Please read the previous discussions. Greenwayfriend (talk) 12:17, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

I have been following the previous discussions. You seem to not appreciate that Man ≠ Male.--Auric talk 18:06, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

As you know, the topic is complex and can be very hurtful to individuals. I am hoping that Alison or some senior editor can help. In the meantime, I ask that you change the article so that it no longer refers to Eve as a man.Greenwayfriend (talk) 19:34, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

In the past Alison has censored all sources that stated Eve was even transgender.--Craigboy (talk) 23:18, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

I think we need Editor assistance for a BLP. Is that the correct place to start? I've never requested one. Greenwayfriend (talk) 19:41, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for addressing the change notification.Greenwayfriend (talk) 02:34, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

I edited the article to say what the video interview in the source says. Which is what the subject said, which is what we should be publishing here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:00, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

I guess this means Erika is going to stop having her lawyers threaten wikipedia with legal action. What's weird is initially Erika Elizabeth Ervin was very open about her previous life and only seemed to re-enter "the closet" when she decided to start modeling around 2009. She discussed her previous life and her transition in the 2007 documentary Trans/Formed. She also mentioned being transgender in a 2007 article (page 22) for now defunct LGBT publication IN magazine. Her given name was William Ervin Pilger.--Craigboy (talk) 23:15, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Since she confirmed her sexual reassignment isn't comments like 'She says that all the women in her family are tall and this can probably be attributed to her German and Dutch heritage' or 'She can also attribute her (...) 38D breasts (...) to that heritage' incorrect by nature? These seems like things she said because she didn't want to tell the truth by the time. Vinny Seixas 21:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vipseixas (talk • contribs)

Entering Data Related to Eve's appearances in American Horror Story

I have a conflict of interest. May I add to the filmography table facts about the (four, so far) episodes of American Horror Story: Season 4 Freak Show (2014-201) in which she appears? Citation will be to IMDb.Greenwayfriend (talk) 21:57, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

@Greenwayfriend:  Done. See WP:EDITREQ for how to create a request that will be seen by more editors, I saw this one just because I have it in my watchlist. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:18, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

May I add to the filmography table facts about the four episodes of American Horror Story: Freak Show in which Amazon Eve appears? Data will be extracted from with citations to IMDb. Fact, not comments.

Greenwayfriend (talk) 01:00, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

I may not update because I have a conflict of interest. At this point Amazon Eve is in nine episodes of American Horror Story: Season 4 Freak Show (2014-2015). There is no official Web site for information about the cast. The show relies on IMDb. Greenwayfriend (talk) 05:06, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

References

I don't get it

This person's whole notability is due to being an extremely tall female model, right? Yet she is extremely tall because she is biologically male, which invalidates the whole notability criterion. This article should not be here. Ssh kg ssh bc (talk) 03:42, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Erika Ervin is not "biologically male", which is essentially just a fancy way of saying "Transgender don't real; this person is just a deluded dude playing dress-up!", which is blatantly transphobic and denialist, and also ignorant of actual biological science (just like saying "Homosexuality don't real; gay men and lesbian women are just heterosexual dudes and chicks in denial!" is obviously homophobic and denialist) – and likely also transmisogynist because for some reason, nobody gives a shit about trans men; virtually all the hate goes towards trans women. (If you don't believe there is anything "biological" and "real" about transgender, try taking estrogens and antiandrogens, maybe even get vaginoplasty or facial feminisation surgery, and observe the effects on your body, brain and psyche. Medical transition is more than just an extreme cosmetic procedure, and isn't something that any random person can undergo and find a positive experience. If you're not transgender, you're probably not going to enjoy it.) Erika Ervin was assigned male at birth and given a male name (because our society somehow finds it necessary to do this unconsensually to infants, as presumably the world would end if this practice was abandoned), and by 2004 transitioned medically and socially to change her name and go on to live as a woman, and she is therefore a trans woman. Nobody denies this; the article makes this explicit.

Your argument appears to be that because she (very much involuntarily, and likely with much suffering) underwent a male-like puberty, causing her to grow taller than she may have otherwise, she somehow had an "unfair advantage" and she isn't a "naturally tall woman", which somehow disqualifies her for the title (and notice that even if you choose to think so, that she should not be thought of as the tallest model because she is trans, the fact that the article does not conceal her transgender background allows you to do exactly that). That's like saying that the tumor that made Sandy Allen grow to be the tallest woman in the world in her time gave her an "unfair advantage" and her height wasn't "natural", either. Both transgender and tumors are, however, natural conditions. Neither Ervin nor Allen wilfully chose to be tall. And notably, both are or were respectively unusually tall even for women with their respective conditions.

Finally, note that the article doesn't even call her the tallest female model, only the tallest model, without reference to her gender, which makes her transgender background irrelevant: there's no question that if she is the tallest model, she would be the tallest model even if she were a drag queen or crossdresser. (In fact, the article deliberately does not even directly claim that she is the tallest model, just state that she has been called the tallest model by the media, which is undoubtedly correct, and which is what her notability derives from.)

And all of this is ultimately irrelevant anyway because notability is not temporary. Even if she were an impostor of some sort, and only mistakenly believed to be the tallest female model and therefore notable (however, she is also notable as a model, as a transgender model, as a very tall model, etc., regardless of whether she is truly the tallest), the media coverage she has received would qualify her for a Wikipedia article anyway. So, your objection is completely baseless. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 11:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Biologically male/female is real. It has nothing to do with whether or not transgender is real. For me, as a biologist, if I say biologically male I mean the cells that make up the person's body all contain XY chromosomes for the sex chromosomes, similarly female is XX. I am ignoring conditions like XXY or XYY. This has nothing to do with their gender identity, but does mean a lot for their health. For instance, XY has a lot less to worry about in terms of breast cancer than XX. Also, XY is much more likely to be colorblind. And it does make a big difference, if no intervention is done, regarding the effects of puberty, which does include average height. I agree that the original comment's tone is not a very welcoming one, but there are real biological differences.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.89.12.74 (talk) 22:42, July 22, 2017

If you are a biologist you should know that breast cancer risk is influenced by hormones, not chromosomes. Transgender women routinely take estradiol, and testosterone blockers if needed, so their breast cancer risk is like that of cisgender women. Sex is a lot more complicated than XX and XY. And if a transgender woman's unwelcome testosterone-dominated puberty is treated early enough, and she gets the hormones she wants, she's extremely unlikely to grow this tall, no more likely than a cisgender woman. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 05:03, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

The article is transphobic, the talk section is transphobic. It is an assault on Erika, not an article 104.34.202.79 (talk) 22:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

I love eve

I'm in love with her s need to marry her bad. 97.94.86.183 (talk) 08:17, 25 February 2022 (UTC)