This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cetaceans, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CetaceansWikipedia:WikiProject CetaceansTemplate:WikiProject CetaceansCetaceans articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The article says that the skeleton found of Ambulocetus was "very complete." This may be an overstatement. "Partially complete" would possibly be a better term. As well, the article says that there is only one other genus in the family, however, Himalayacetus is clearly listed as a species within the family. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.29.88.67 (talk) 22:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Done Updated. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 18:36, 23 February 2013 (UTC)