Talk:Amejo
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Tom.Reding in topic Please confirm classification
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amejo article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Amejo. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Amejo at the Reference desk. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 28 December 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Categories for "Race" and "Sexual Fetishism"
editI placed two categories for "Race" (since this interest is racial) and for "Sexual fetishism" (since some of these relationships are obviously sexual), and they were specifically removed by user: TakuyaMurata. Edit
Rather than get into an edit war, I would like to get the reason it is felt they are not appropriate...--Joel Lindley (talk) 03:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- For the record, I didn't remove the categories. But I agree with the removal because putting such categories might not be NPOV. -- Taku (talk) 04:26, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- I understand. Since the article is new, I guess we'll just see how it goes from there.--Joel Lindley (talk) 19:38, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- This terms seems either made up or not widely used. I think this makes it problematic for inclusion here. Is there a Wikipedia Japan page with this term? If not, this term is bs. --Soda80 (talk) 22:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- How is the term "BS" if there are reputable sources for the terms?--Joel Lindley (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
merge article
edittwo terms which deserve no article YVNP (talk) 12:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, this isn't a forum on our personal opinions on terms or articles; but, whether or not it fits Wikipedia. If you feel you can add to it, do so.--Joel Lindley (talk) 16:44, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Please confirm classification
editThe WikiProject classification for Amejo is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 20:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)