Talk:AmeriCares

This article was nominated for deletion on 31 January 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from Text which is described in the OTRS ticket. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2010020210042866.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

Untitled

Latest comment: 9 years ago6 comments5 people in discussion

Who keeps editing this article? It is biased far too much towards their benefit. It's like I'm reading a promotional advertisement.

I too noticed that it's veered towards blatant advertising. Must be fixed. piksi (talk) 08:02, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Judging by the tone, a lot of the text looks like it's probably taken from AmeriCares' own press materials, which makes me question its copyright status in addition to any POV concerns. 98.110.168.52 (talk) 18:27, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

A lot of it was (is) taken right out of there website. Put the copyviolation tag on it. AfD was speedily closed, was thinking of relisting but quick google news search seems to indicate the organization is indeed notable. So it's a matter of rewrite.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 16:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Permission received. Stifle (talk) 19:18, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

That doesn't fix the promotion problems.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 23:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

For balance you could discuss Americares' relationship with the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.40.24.4 (talk) 12:57, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic