Talk:America's Court with Judge Ross

This page reads like an advertisement for the show.

Genre

Should it be listed as a reality show when the disclaimer at the end says the people are fictious? Kielhofer 15:50, 10 May 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kielhofer (talk • contribs)

3BAAS Media Group must like have the truth obout Kevin Ross being kicked off the bench in California and not being able to practice law there again since they took down the posting and link to the appropriate website down. Kielhofer 15:35, 9 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kielhofer (talk • contribs)

I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT I'M ENJOYING JUDGE ROSS VERY MUCH. I DON'T MISS ANY OF HIS SHOWS, HE'S ALMOST AS GOOD AS JUDGE JUDY! I HOPE THAT HIS SHOW STAYS ON FOR MANY YEARS TO COME.

THANK YOU!

RUTHIE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.30.109.171 (talk) 06:24, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

New Fan of America's Court!!!

I am retired and have the time to watch more television. I have watched several shows with Judge Ross and personally I think it is the best court show on the air. He is personable, believable, honest, and practicable. I love his deductive thinking. He is just plain GOOD!!! Whether the show is a fake or not, it is great entertainment and he is spot on with the law and in other cases, the sensitivity of his rulings are great!!! The humanness at which he identifies with many of the cases is so refreshing!!!! I give his show a 4.8 out of 5!!!! Charleyross (talk) 16:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Fairness

I can’t believe that you made your final decision ruling based upon a lie detector test of the defendant. Most Courts do not rule solely on the credibility of such a test. I don’t think you offered the Plaintiff an opportunity to take the test to determine her credibility. I believe you are not a fair Judge in my opinion snd possibly a racist again in my opinion 24.51.153.71 (talk) 07:04, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Never again I feel he is to stupid to ever watch again. 67.40.201.84 (talk) 17:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Wrong judgement

I watched an episode where a mother sued the nanny for in game charges on an app that she gave the nanny permission to download for her son. The son then went on to charge over $1500 in the game. The judge held the nanny responsible for those charges. I don't think that judgement was fair because as a video game player I know that in order to make in game purchases there has to be a credit or debit card attached to the game. So in order for her son to make those charges she had to have first knowledge and give her card information in order for the purchases to occur. So regardless of whether she gave permission for the download of the app she had to provide her card information in order for the son to make the purchases. This removing the responsibility of the nanny for the charges. 2601:4C3:8100:6260:1152:B10E:F490:CB1D (talk) 20:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)