Talk:American Antitrust Institute
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Some prior revisions of this article were derived in whole or part from http://www.antitrustinstitute.org/, though it is believed that this content has now been removed from the article.
Permission was received from the copyright holder to release this material under the GNU Free Documentation License. Because this permission was received prior to 1 November 2008, you may use the material under either that license or the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2009052110075481. Content is GFDL only, see #Copyright problem below  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
Untitled
editMay it be so, but i believe the article needs a bit of fine tuning. My eyes bleed after reading in that poor layout. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.136.43.10 (talk) 20:04, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
- It seems to me that the article was created by the Institute's Communication Manager's [1] verbatim submission of their About Us page [2]. Other contributors' efforts to spiff it up with hotlinks, etc. are of course positive contributions. However the article obviously needs editing into encyclopedic form, both grammar and point of view. AHMartin (talk) 14:00, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Copyright problem
editThis article was created with content copied from https://web.archive.org/web/20090514070323/http://www.antitrustinstitute.org/about_us/index.ashx. At the time of creation, the content was under a non-free custom non-commercial-use license. Permission to publish the content under the GFDL 1.2+ was sought and obtained from the copyright holder and is archived in ticket:2009052110075481. The Wikipedia:Licensing update prohibits the addition of GFDL-only content from outside sources after 1 November 2008 as it can not be relicensed to CC-BY-SA-3.0. The content of the source website has changed and is now under a non-free CC BY-NC-ND-3.0 license. The copied content has already been removed from the article as an NPOV violation but should also be revdeleted as a copyright violation. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)