This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article omits mention of one of the key arguments in support of Aereo, specifically that while "public performances" are subject to copyright and require royalty payments or licenses, "private performances" do not, and the business Aero was in essentially consisted of many individual private performances controlled by each individual customer if each customer was their own individual DVR. Aereo wasn't in the business of public broadcasts like cable companies. 134.204.220.36 (talk) 22:38, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
