Talk:American Diabetes Association
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Liophidium.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Liophidium.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Diabetes statistics
editMy feeling is that information needs to be in the prevalence section of, for instance, Diabetes mellitus, Diabetes mellitus type 1 and/or Diabetes mellitus type 2. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- I agreed, so I killed the stats. WhatamIdoing 06:01, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Almost all organizations like this one are corrupt in some manner. They are more interested in selling drugs than promoting simple cures. There needs to be a criticism of ADA section... such as how they continue to advocate for official government "Pyramid" diet in the face of growing evidence that Atkin's and other low carb diets work.
Controversy over ADA's ignoring of surgical cures
editPerhaps there should be a section added discussing the notable silence from the ADA on the 99% long-term remission/cure rate that the BPD-DS surgery (known as the Duodenal Switch) has on type 2 diabetes? In addition, gastric bypass surgery has demonstrated a roughly 50-60% long-term remission rate for type 2 diabetes. One would think the ADA would be screaming from every rooftop to let people know about these findings, but nary a word. Why isn't it plastered all over their website? Where is the ADA's educational campaign to get out the word about surgical cures -- to save lives, extend lifespan, and improve quality of life for those afflicted with type 2 diabetes? Why is it that only a pharmaceutical industry pill can be considered a "real" cure for adult-onset diabetes? It is highly doubtful that any prescription drug in the next century will come remotely close to the across-the-board resolution of diabesity-related health problems that these two bariatric surgeries currently deliver, yet everyone is supposed to keep waiting and hoping for the impossible? Could it be that the ADA doesn't want anything to potentially encroach on their turf or impede their fundraising -- what is the reason? In any case, it would seem relevant to note in the article how the ADA has been notably silent on these (pretty stunning) findings, to the point that the public at large doesn't even know about the existence of surgical options. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdmwiki (talk • contribs) 19:52, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on American Diabetes Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130305021847/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-12/charities-deceive-donors-unaware-money-goes-to-a-telemarketer.html to http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-12/charities-deceive-donors-unaware-money-goes-to-a-telemarketer.html/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130128061319/http://www.nbc.com:80/news-sports/today-show/2012/09/donors-unaware-charity-money-goes-to-telemarketer/ to http://www.nbc.com/news-sports/today-show/2012/09/donors-unaware-charity-money-goes-to-telemarketer/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Should be tagged
editThis article has a long history of having anything negative about the organization removed. In addition it seems like individuals have been paid or at least have a COI have been editing this article. --VVikingTalkEdits 18:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Diabetes
editAir travel with diabetes insulin pens I see it is allowed 2600:1700:960:2020:18FB:2723:2F8A:3ADB (talk) 15:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)