Talk:American Homeowner Preservation

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article issues

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article needs considerable pruning and copyediting. It is written not as a straightforward history of the company with a brief description of its activity, but as an alternative web page for it and advertisement for their potential clients and investors. It is also devoid inline citations to verify the claims made in the article. There is probably enough press coverage from reliable independent sources to justify inclusion of this article, but note that several of the sources listed in "Press coverage" are simply press-releases and/or entries from blogs and other sites with user-generated content. They need to be pruned. I have placed the COI tag on this article because it has been extensively edited by a user with the same name as the company [1], and it shows. Earlier versions of this article were even more promotional in tone suggesting that they too were written either by someone associated with the company or a paid editor. Voceditenore (talk) 07:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

CONFLICT OF INTEREST - WRITING ABOUT ONE'S SELF - BLATENT COMMERCIAL PROMOTION / ADVERTISING.

This article was written by Jorge Newbery with the assistance of the young lady in his office who was the acting marketing person. This really doesn't belong on wikipedia as this is nothing but thinly veiled promotional / advertising piece . Wikipedia should remove, especially as there are now suspicions about the handling of AHP's books. I have been involved in a due diligence investigation of the fund and find this article to violate Wikipedia's intentions and mission. It is my feeling the article simply needs to be removed as Mr. Newbery is using wikipedia to validate the investment fund he is operating. Firstly, the mission of the company as stated in the article represents a minute fraction of their business (this is 100% for profit). Second, Leaving this page on wikipedia gives Mr. Newbery a respected resource from which to convince investors to bring him money for his fund. Sounds like promotion and advertising to me. ZentraderX (talk) 22:52, 31 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic