Talk:American Ornithological Society

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Spintendo in topic Updates needed

Note on Use of Primary Sources

edit

To all who review this article for citations proving notability, search for citations of The Auk and of the AOU. The historic organization is among the "oft' quoted, seldom written about." Most of the authoritative sources on the organization are primary. The notability of the organization is proven by how often it's members and publications are quoted as authoritative in matters of zoology and ornithology for over a hundred years. DocTree (talk) 19:12, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on American Ornithological Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:29, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Updates needed

edit

I am an employee of AOS, so it's a conflict of interest for me to do any of this myself. However, this whole page is sorely in need of an overhaul! 2600:6C54:7600:3384:C1BE:A60A:F255:5C25 (talk) 20:59, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reply 21-AUG-2019

edit

   Clarification requested  

  • To expedite your request, kindly state each specific desired change in the form of verbatim statements which can be added to the article (if approved) by the reviewer. Exact, verbatim descriptions of any text to be removed should also be described including the exact location where the desired claims are to be placed.[1] Finally, reasons should be provided for each change.[2] An example edit request for how this is to be done is shown below:
Edit request example
  • Please remove the third sentence from the second paragraph of the Sun section:

"The Sun's diameter is estimated to be approximately 25 miles in length."

  • Please add the following claim as the third sentence of the second paragraph of the Sun section:

"The Sun's diameter is estimated to be approximately 864,337 miles in length."

  • Using as the reference:

Paramjit Harinath (2019). The Sun. Academic Press. p. 1.

  • Reason for change being made:

"The previously given diameter was incorrect."
  • Kindly open a new edit request at your earliest convenience when ready to proceed with the verbatim text and the placement locations.


Regards,  Spintendo  22:11, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Template:Request edit". Wikipedia. 15 September 2018. Instructions for Submitters: Describe the requested changes in detail. This includes the exact proposed wording of the new material, the exact proposed location for it, and an explicit description of any wording to be removed, including removal for any substitution.
  2. ^ "Template:Request edit". Wikipedia. 15 September 2018. Instructions for Submitters: If the rationale for a change is not obvious (particularly for proposed deletions), explain.