Talk:Amifampridine

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Amifampridine.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 3,4-Diaminopyridine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150521162420/http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/opdlisting/oopd/OOPD_Results_2.cfm?Index_Number=464814 to http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/opdlisting/oopd/OOPD_Results_2.cfm?Index_Number=464814

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:41, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Unsupported/Incorrect Information

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

These two sentences were moved to Talk as they are not supported by the references cited and appear to be incorrect. The first statement mistakes the a type of FDA citation ("483") with the number of citations. The second statement refers to a document which appears to endorse use of the free base for LEMS treatment despite the deficit of preclinical toxicology and pharmacology studies.

Other commentators noted, however, that Jacobus was not able to meet the needs of all people who could benefit from the drug via its free program, and that its manufacturing practices had quality control problems, with 483 FDA citations in 2011 and 2012.^[1] Similarly, at the urging of Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, the French drug authority had reviewed the use of the free base in light of the manufactured phosphate form in 2006, and had urged doctors in France not to use the free base form due to quality issues.^[2]

^ Cite error: The named reference Stat2016 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ "Point d'information sur l'utilisation de la 3.4 diaminopyridine". ANSM : Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé. December 18, 2006.

Prithason (talk) 14:13, 10 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[Stat2016-1] Cite error: The named reference Stat2016 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[2] "Point d'information sur l'utilisation de la 3.4 diaminopyridine". ANSM : Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé. December 18, 2006.

[1]

[2]