Untitled

edit

Informal discussion:

I (Shd) added Fanatic and Mystic demos to the list since I've coded them, and they can't be considered famous.

Should we create entries for Amiga demo groups like this? amigademoscene:groupname

Should we add demo party names to the demo list?

why not? It's up to you.

Article fix-up

edit

I've taken the liberty of copyediting and wikifying the article. I also reorganized the demo list by putting it in its own section and separating the demos into sublists under the respective groups. I also made sure every group name is linked and that every reference to a year goes to the corresponding Wikipedia article, and I added " (demo group)" to the title in the link for any groups whose names are ambiguous. I also fixed the URL link in there. Finally, removed the copyedit tag.

Now you just need more content. :-) Ddawson 18:44, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Suggestions

edit

This list would work much better if there were dates associated with the demo names, possibly even listed in chronological order to show progression over time. --Jolyonralph 00:09, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I suggest doing away with the list altogether. How does anyone decide what goes or doesn't go on it? If we're going to list some demos, we're going to have to pick some criteria and agree on it. --Vossanova o< 00:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Or else move the list to its own article and link it from this article. - Richardcavell 21:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Style cleanup

edit

I decided to do a little style cleanup on this page. In accordance with one of the style guidelines, I've changed the essentially empty Fred Fish section into a See-also section referencing the article. (I know that article is a stub, but there's at least something there, as opposed to here.) Ddawson 15:25, 20 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point

edit
edit

The image Image:Ptn-gift.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply