Talk:Aminopterin

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

According to the Free Online Dictionary by Farlex (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/aminopterin): aminopterin is "a folic acid antagonist, C19H20N8O5, used as an antineoplastic agent. It has been mainly replaced by methotrexate" and therefore, I think there should be some sort of explantion as to why it's redirected to methotrexate so as not to confuse the two molecules as being one in the same.


Folinic acid as treatment?

edit

I've found a few links indicating Folinic acid can be used as a treatment because it is in a form that the body can use directly and is not blocked by the effects of the aminopterin. I am hesitant to add this info to the article as I have no real background in biochemistry. If someone with more background feels this information is suitable for inclusion, here are a couple links.

http://www.wyeth.ca/en/products/Product%20Monographs%20PDFs/Leucovorin_Jul15_2004%5B1%5D.pdf
http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/121/11/833

--Dfred 23:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Folinic acid is indeed routinely used to counter the effects of methotrexate on healthy cells—this is known as "leucovorin rescue"—and as an antidote for MTX overdose. It has probably been studied for the same purpose with aminopterin, but I'm not a physician or vet, so I'd be hesitant to add this to the article as well. A PubMed search for "aminopterin" and "citrovorum" (name for folinic acid way back when) may produce some interesting articles. Fvasconcellos 13:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Looks like this info made its way into the article. I have restructured what was there into a more logical format, but it still needs work... --Dfred 17:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mine this

edit

Might want to mine this blog thead for aid in finding reliable sources for more info about the chemical, re Syntrex, etc. Syntrex study is cited in Wiki article with no mention that it owns some part of the rights to it. No time for me to do this now. Andyvphil 10:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

pronunciation?

edit

I've always pronounced this as (uh-MEEN-o-TEAR-in), giving credence to its nitrogen and pterin character, but I've heard others (particular non-scientists) pronounce it (AM-in-OP-trin). Given that the p is supposed to be silent (like in pterodactyl) I would think the former is correct. Although I do realize language is plastic and we do of course pronounce the p in helicopter.Pdcook (talk) 18:51, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Illogical as it may be, I've always heard it pronounced the latter way, as prescribed in most dictionaries. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 19:15, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I feared as much! Pdcook (talk) 19:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aminopterin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply