Talk:Amos Lee/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 15:48, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Will review it in the next days

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I understand this article is fairly short, but at least try to add more to the lead, for example that he released four albums in the following years, that his music was included in soundtracks or performed in shows, that he played for Obama voter registration rally... a little bit more information would be nice.

   The career section could be improved. Currently it reads like a timeline or in note form.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Ref 29 needs to be fixed

   Ref 16 should be build (accessdate, url, etc)

   No all-capitals writing per WP:ALLCAPS

   Non-english sources should be noted (with language= parameter)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• Dabsolver check: fixed two dabs
• Checklinks check: two dead links
• Reflinks check: filled some refs
• Fixed dashes
• On hold until you fix those
• Nice, but try to replace IMDB references, because it is user-submitted and has low editorial oversight
• Ok, I see you italicize the newspapers, but you should not italicize after work=, because it changes back to normal font
• Ref 34 and ref 38 should be changed to German (Austrian is not a language but a language variety anyway)
• Now you added a few references; tv.com and locatetv.com should be removed as they are unreliable.

• Pass very nice job!