Talk:Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Radiology / Neurology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Radiology task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Pictures in the Infobox

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The pictures do not demonstrate the differences between ARIA-E and ARIA-H; the image uploaded to Wikipedia is too low quality so the microhaemorrages in the right image are not visible. They are visible on the source image as small block dots which is how microhaemorrhages appear on susceptibility weighted MR sequences (sequences which show susceptibility artefacts, used to show haemosiderin from blood and calcium deposits). They are blurred out of view on the low resolution image on Wikipedia.

Either the picture should be removed or a higher resolution picture uploaded. However it is also unclear whether the picture is uploaded with permission as it appears to have been lifted from a scientific paper which it links to.

I think the current picture should be removed. An alternative set of images is available at https://radiopaedia.org/articles/amyloid-related-imaging-abnormalities-aria - cases uploaded to this site are shared under a modified creative commons license but I am unsure if that is suitable for Wikipedia? DomUK (talk) 21:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

? Article should be removed

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article may be to narrow in scope for Wikipedia. This topic is covered in scientific and medicine specialised sites, such as Radiopaedia for Radiology. It may be too niche for a whole article on Wikipedia.

The specific appearance of one side effect of one type of new Alzheimer's targetting drugs probably does not warrent it's own wikipedia article. DomUK (talk) 21:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic