This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
It is a book, made on clay tablets, thats why it is on quotation Marks. and the tablet, even on short term relations is completely open about Ki. Im Sorry but I think you're wrong. 177.240.140.40 (talk) 15:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
First, it's not a book, it's a series of clay tablets. Second, Anu is paired with Antu on tablet I, which is already reflected by the article, and none of his spouses have separate sections the way major deities do, you can quite literally read the list for yourself, it's linked in the bibliography (Litke 1998). There is no separate Ki section, Ki was not a major goddess, she was not even usually a personified figure (see Lambert's 2013 Babylonian Creation Myths for details), these are virtually undisputable facts, the Assyriological consensus. The fact someone presumably saw her in an ancient aliens video or a book from 50 years ago - the usual "sources" people find Ki in since in actual primary sources Urash and Antu appear much more commonly - does not mean we're going to change what the text itself and commentaries on it say. The closest to Ki you will get in An = Anum is the logogram AN.KI given as a writing of the names Anu and Antu - for users who do not want to go through the whole list, there's a summary courtesy of Walther Sallaberger here.
In particular it strikes me as disruptive to insert Ki between Ninhursag and Enki - both the sequence in the lead and the article as a whole are arranged in the same order as the sections in the actual list is, and Ki is definitely not there. The Ninhursag section concludes with her children and Enki immediately follows, no trace of Ki is to be found on tablet II. HaniwaEnthusiast (talk) 07:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
