Talk:An Enemy of the People

Latest comment: 8 months ago by 2600:6C50:800:DC1:9023:20D9:8EFF:A7A9 in topic Victorian


Victorian

edit

I don't know much about Norwegian history and culture, but I do think that the use of the word "Victorian" about Ibsen's themes is very inappropriate. Queen Victoria was, after all, queen of Britain, not of the whole of the 19th century Western world! -- IP User 80.36.80.101 13 Apr 2007


"Victorian" is a term used to mean "the era of Queen Victoria", in other words, the era between 1837 and 1901. It does not imply in any way that she was queen of the entire world. AlbertSM (talk) 00:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, but do Europeans from non-English speaking countries call the period that? We do in the US, and I suppose they do in other former British colonies as well as the UK, but that time period is called "la belle epoque" in France. 2600:6C50:800:DC1:9023:20D9:8EFF:A7A9 (talk) 13:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Theatre Assessment

edit

--Dereksmootz (talk) 20:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Terminology

edit

" hypocrisy of Victorian morality" - well, Queen Victoria may have ruled in the UK, but that designation surely does not apply to Ibsen .... surely "19th Century" would be better ? Plus in Australia, a "Victorian" is a native of that state ! 195.59.147.60 (talk) 08:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Minority is Always Right - quote

edit

It would be good if this article were to quote one of the more famous passages from the play "The minority is always right". This makes the play sound a satire on democracy, which one could view it as, but also as a play about an individualist's fight against the masses. Perhaps the article could say more about how Ibsen felt that he would have got on well with Stockmann,even if he said he was less muddle-headed. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 22:54, 23 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Historical source

edit

http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC1662831/pdf/bmj00176-0041.pdf indicates that there were real events that Ibsen used as a basis for his play. Kdammers (talk) 02:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on An Enemy of the People. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:54, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Adaptation broadcast

edit

The article could say how an adaptation of this play was broadcast on BBC Radio Four on Easter Sunday, 2018. Vorbee (talk) 15:09, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Dystopian literature?

edit

Is the "Dystopian literature" category appropriate? This play deals with the corruption of the 19th-century society, and it is a little bit different from typical dystopian literature. --saebou (talk) 13:03, 26 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

help i accidentally broke the article

edit

i was trying to update it with info from the tonys and i accidentally broke it. new editor pls be nice User: Mondo1138 (talk) 00:21, 17 June 2024