Talk:An Essay on Man

source

What is the source on this quotation: "the most beautiful, the most useful, the most sublime didactic poem ever written in any language"?! Google shows up nothing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.214.248.251 (talk) 07:09, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour

Je recherche une citation d'alexander pope entendue dans le film eternal sunshine.....: "Heureux ceux qui...... Si vous la connaissez, merci de me la faire suivre: pascale. renard@laposte.net

Possibly the verses  
Happy the man, whose wish and care
 A few paternal acres bound ...Seadowns (talk) 00:17, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on An Essay on Man. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061010113614/http://rpo.library.utoronto.ca/poet/263.html to http://rpo.library.utoronto.ca/poet/263.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090622022849/http://rpo.library.utoronto.ca//display//index.cfm to http://rpo.library.utoronto.ca/display/index.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

completely wrong

The interpretation expressed in this article is completely wrong. It's optimistic alright, but only when you correctly define optimism as Leibniz as this is the best of all possible worlds. I'm not surprised that someone should come up with the reverse, because this is a very "Whig" country, which will not admit of original sin. Such people begin with God and not man. Bolingbroke was a Platonist as were the 19th c Whigs with all their coercive measures, and they remain so today. They make it seem man is perfectible, but make the attempt impossible and authoritarian. Whatever is, must be right, because we are in no position to know otherwise no matter what such people think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.28.145.174 (talk) 20:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)