Talk:An Khe (The West Wing)/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has many problems in comparison with the criteria, particularly in the realms of scope, referencing, OR, and the non-free content criteria. It does not contain a "Production" or "Reception" section, which are the two key parts other than the plot summary for a television article, and many of its references, including several unofficial fan sites and IMDb, are not reliable. The last paragraph of the cultural references section is unsourced, while many of the references for the section state nothing about their inclusion in the episode, making them OR-suspicious. The article also contains two non-free files, which both do not have detailed fair use rationales—there are only boilerplate templates. There was no adequate GA review--just a statement by someone that the article had no problems. There wasn't even a review page. Johanna^{(talk to me!)} 19:34, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Current assessment

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

At this point it has been a week without any replies from the editors I notified. I will now delist the article. Johanna^{(talk to me!)} 22:17, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: