Talk:Anableps anableps

Latest comment: 23 days ago by Bloodshot20 in topic Reproductive Structures Image

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Eddie891 (talk14:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 07:17, 30 January 2021 (UTC).Reply

  •  ...No copyvio issues. Hook is in article and followed by inline citation to a reference containing hook fact. Might be worth spelling out in main text that it has 2 eyes with 4 pupils and checking the source says so. The proposed hook is quite eye-catching. Thank you.Whispyhistory (talk) 13:18, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

So it eats mostly invertebrates. And mostly algae? And also diatoms?

edit

"Anableps anableps feeds on insects and other small invertebrates and on algae ... It also ingests silt, consuming the diatoms found among the grains.[ ... Red intertidal algae (Catenella sp.) was the main food item, supplemented by insects and shore crabs, family Grapsidae."

So mainly algae? Mainly insects? Detritus feeder? IAmNitpicking (talk) 03:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Diatoms are a form of algae. Like humans, it enjoys a varied diet! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Eyes

edit

The intro states: " … each eye is split into two lobes by a horizontal band of tissue, … "; however, under Description is "Each eye is divided longitudinally … ". Unless I'm confusing latitude (horizontal) and longitude (vertical), the Description comment can't be right: the fish would have to lie on its side in order to let the dividing line align with the water surface, and the other eye would therefore be entirely submerged or entirely out of the water. Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 08:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have rephrased this. Is it clearer now? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Indeed it is, Cwmhiraeth. Thanks! Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 00:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reproductive Structures Image

edit

I added a lot to this article, but I think it could still benefit greatly from an image of the gonopodium/foriculum. There is one from the Garman source that I considered adding, but I wasn't too sure about the copyright rules behind it. It's an article from the 1890's and is in JSTOR's Open Collection, but I wanted to be safe so I didn't include it. There's a "request permission" link on the JSTOR page, so maybe someone can check that out? Bloodshot20 (talk) 07:56, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply