Talk:Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Malik Shabazz in topic More references tag

Fair use rationale for Image:Anarchylogo.jpg

edit
 

Image:Anarchylogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia's policies on "fair use" are totally bizarre. It's common legal knowledge that journalistic and informational projects can replicate a company's logo. Watch the TV news any time and you will see company logos used all of the time in news stories. In the case of Anarchy magazine, this discussion is all the more absurd and pointless given that Anarchy has an anti-copyright policy. Chuck0 21:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

More references tag

edit

Have added the above tag because the only references in the article are for the current location of the magazine. We need additional references for previous publication locations, for the reference to primitivism and for the authors named in the second section.

Not entirely convinced is article passes the general notability guideline - anything that demonstrates additional significant coverage of this journal, reliable secondary sources? -- Euryalus (talk) 00:39, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Malik Shabazz, would you happen to have any secondary sources for this article? Or ideas for places to look? czar 16:21, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hi Czar. Unfortunately, most of modern anarchism—outside of black bloc and a few "big names" like Bob Black and John Zerzan—is not (yet) documented in reliable sources. In 75 years, maybe a future Paul Avrich will write about Jason McQuinn and Fred Woodworth and their contemporaries the way Avrich wrote about the Russian anarchists of the late 19th and early 20th century, but until then.... — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply