Talk:Anas ibn Malik

Moved from the article

Concerning the Imam Abu Hanifa this famous Mujtahid accept obviously the narrations reported by the companions; As a proof one can consult the traditions quoted in the "musnad abi hanifah', or also those in the book of hadith of hanafi scholars (like the "muwatta" of Imam Mouhammad or the "Cha'rh Ma'âniyoul Âthâr" of the Imâm At Tahâwi) to be convinced.

Furtheremore, the scholars even report that the Imam Abu Hannifa was a Tâbéï and note among the companions that he could have seen the companion Anas Ibnou Mâlik.

The fact Imam Abu Hannifa does not take systematically the ahadith reported by the companions rather than others, cannot be interpreted like a rejection of the Prophetic traditions. In which case the same accusation can be thrown to Imâm Mâlik, Imâm Ach Shâféï, Imâm Ahmad and thousands of other scholars who gives often a preference in one hadith over another (tard'jîh) in their ijtihad.

Finally when one sees the following sentence (from the first critic of Abu Hannifah saying He doesn't uses hadith of some companions):

"Moreover, in his commentary on Muslim's Sahih, Volume IV, Nadwi emphasizes this point: "

One can easily points out the lack of accuracy and lack of information since An Nadawi has never written any commentary of the Sahih Muslim. The one who did it was An Nawawi

-unsigned 80.236.59.123

Shia/Sunni edit wars

This page appears to be alternating between Sunnis replacing Striver's Shia perspective on this person, and Striver then characterizing their edits as vandalism and replacing it with his WP:OWN. Can we not integrate these two competing versions? Esquizombi 08:53, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

This is the only edit i characterized as vandalism. --Striver 16:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Will add new sources or do it yourself

Just open the book Islamiat for students or Islam beliefs and practices and read the article about him under the secion important personalities. Take the info from there and add it here. Simple!Syed Wasiq Hussain 11:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syed Wasiq (talk • contribs)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anas ibn Malik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20090527023317/http://www.msawest.com/islam/history/biographies/sahaabah/bio.RUMAYSA_BINT_MILHAN.html to http://www.msawest.com/islam/history/biographies/sahaabah/bio.RUMAYSA_BINT_MILHAN.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)