This article is within the scope of WikiProject Social Work, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Social Work on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Social WorkWikipedia:WikiProject Social WorkTemplate:WikiProject Social WorkSocial work articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Anchor (housing association) is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I am a leaseholder in a property administered by Anchor in the City of London. The scheme's manifold problems are due in my view to the multiple layers of so-called 'administration' by scheme, area and regional managers, supposedly working with 'property' and 'finance' sections which have no apparent connection with the managers and rarely meet or discuss matters with them, let alone with the residents concerned. They are illustrated by a resolution of the City's Community and Children's Service Committee taken as recently as 20 July 2022.
The City of London granted a lease to Network Housing Association in 1998 to develop housing for the elderly at Tudor Rose Court, the only housing scheme of its sort within the City. The head lease set out the terms of the sub-tenancies to be granted to City nominated occupiers (about half the occupiers) and leaseholders (the other half). Since 1990, the head lease has passed from Network Housing Association, to Stadium, to Hanover and now to Anchor Housing Association. The terms of the tenancy agreements granted by each have gradually, over the years, been extended and made more onerous than was originally intended by the City. Anchor now requires elderly tenants to pay for major works, including replacement lifts and flooring to all common parts. This was never intended by The City. The annual sinking fund contribution from tenants, which was never provided for in the head lease, has more than doubled in one year. Furthermore, the nineteen City-nominated tenants have endured increasingly poor management from successive housing association landlords, and escalating costs of management. In 2022/23 Anchor has increased tenants' management fee costs by over 100%, without consultation or justification in terms of value for money.
The Committee agreed unanimously to investigate this situation further, with advice from the City Solicitor, to assess what can be done by the City, as freeholder and nominator, and to address this serious issue for many elderly City residents. If those residents had been direct City tenants, they would not be subject to these costs. There was no original intention by the City in granting the head lease to make them liable. The Committee agreed that the views of the City Solicitor be requested to help the City challenge Anchor's current actions. Anthony J. Camp, MBE. AnthonyCamp (talk) 09:54, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply