Talk:And Then There Were Fewer/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 15:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

I never got this far with Family Guy. I always thought it started losing steam around season 4 or 5, when the whole sitcom thing was phased out for the cutaways. Season 1 is still absolutely genius though. Enough of me, review time.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Not seeing any problems with the prose style.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   MOS is fine.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   Citations are fine, no problems there.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Scope is good. Not too narrow or too broad.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Article is neutral and unbiased.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   History is stable and uncontroversial.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Commons images are fine, but the FUR on File:And Then There Were Fewer - Family Guy promo.png seems like a cut-and-paste job - it mentions " the themes behind the character", which is entirely irrelevant. Rewrite it to be specific to the file in question.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Overall the article is ready to pass, though I would still like to see that image given a better rationale. Well done! GRAPPLE X 15:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)