 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that one or more musical audio files be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and included in this article to improve its quality. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request. |
 | A fact from Andante festivo appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 January 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Categorisation
editI’m assuming this edit refers back to this edit @ Eine kleine Nachtmusik.
We have an odd result here: the work that is played by strings alone (the Mozart) is not categorised as such, but the work that includes a part for timpani (the Sibelius) is categorised as for “string orchestra”. That term, to me, denotes nothing but strings; add any other instrument into the mix and you no longer have a “string orchestra”.
Comments? -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 03:11, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Eh, well the timpani part is technically optional, but you do have a point. In Mozart's case, as I said, it's not written as such, even though no changes have to be made to play it with doubled strings, so it seems to me to be inappropriate there, but Sibelius DID designate Andante Festivo to be for string orchestra, was the main point. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 05:07, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
The Sibelius is originally for string quartet, later adapted by Sibelius for string orchestra, with an additional double bass part. The timpani appear only in the orchestral version, and only in the last four bars. The part is marked ad lib. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.75.182.1 (talk) 09:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Andante Festivo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151210213535/http://bhco.co.uk/pages/node/257 to http://bhco.co.uk/pages/node/257
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Untitled
editThe article refers to a recording of the Sibelius performance of this piece issued by the "Columbia Gramophone Company". I think if the contributor examines the original disc they will find the label identifies the issuer as the Columbia GRAPHOPHONE (sic) Company. At the time of its formation "Gramophone" was a trade name, and jealously guarded as such. Delahays (talk) 15:45, 15 May 2019 (UTC)