Talk:Anders Matthesen

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

POV

edit

The article is very pro for Anders Matthesen, perhaps it should be a little less pro. Right now it sounds a bit like a fanpage -- Snailwalker | talk 17:14, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I agree with the POV problem. I have attempted to fix this a bit now, let me know what you think. JoachimK 19:28, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yeah it is much better now, I've fixed some language and stuff but it is quite good now --Snailwalker | talk 20:28, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I will remove the POV notice, as this issue seems to have been resolved and haven't heard any objections :) JoachimK 19:14, 12 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fine with me :-) --Snailwalker | talk 22:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anders Matthesen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply