Talk:Anderson baronets of St Ives (1629)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Charles Matthews in topic Oppose deletion
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 August 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by Fram (talk · contribs) on 19 August 2023. |
Oppose deletion
editThe article had one standard reference, Burke, and now has a second, Cokayne. To say no notability is over the top. As is typical of hereditary titles, there is literature mentioning this baronetcy.
I will develop the article with an infobox, as is normal. Whether it should be at this title or for the baronet is a a matter for discussion. @Fram: brought a comparable case to AfD some time ago, and the conclusion is that there should be just one article in such a singleton case (title or person). No justification there for deletion. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:18, 19 August 2023 (UTC)