Talk:Anderton Boat Lift

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Springnuts in topic What year did the restoration start?

An Engineering Icon?

edit

I removed the following section from the main article, because it is unsourced and POV:


An interesting diversion is to consider how the appearance of the Anderton Lift relates to the concept of engineering elegance.

There is a way of thinking, probably misguided, that if something looks well, it probably is well. However, the Anderton Lift has to look like one of the most inellegant engineered structures that one might ever encounter. The photographs cannot begin to suggest just how ugly an engineered structure this is; it becomes fully apparent only on first-hand observation. Its ugliness is an aspect of the structure that makes it even more remarkable.

This is not a detraction from its worth, nor a slur. Indeed, it is something that may make the Anderton lift even more remarkable as a piece of mechanical and civil engineering. It shows that it need not look well to work well!


If a third-party discussion of the appearance of the boat lift can be found, then a summary of the contents of this source, with citation, could be included. Without this, this is a statement of the contributor's point of view, and so is unencyclopaedic. Incidentally, the original boat lift, before the addition of the A-frames when it was converted to electric operation, looked much more elegant than it does today. Gandalf61 07:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Expand

edit

The bulk of the article is ready to go forward as a GAC, but we need much more on the restoration. Mayalld 06:53, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anderton Boat Lift. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

What year did the restoration start?

edit

What year did the restoration start? I notice that the article is internally inconsistent: 2000 and 2001 Springnuts (talk) 20:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply