Talk:Andhadhun/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Veera Narayana (talk · contribs) 04:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello there! Reviewing tonight. Veera Narayana 04:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

• There are some places where citations are needed. Look for them.
• The post-production section has got nothing really to talk about post production. It actually acquits itself well in the above two sections of the production.
• Some minors here and there, though not compelling issues for a GA.

Solid work overall. I though it would go for a direct pass, but, there are things that needed to be addressed. Let me know ehen you are done. Veera Narayana 08:26, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Veera Narayana Resolved your above queries. Sorry for the late response. Yashthepunisher (talk) 20:27, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.

   Pass or Fail:

   Veera Narayana 06:33, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Veera Narayana Thanks for the review. Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:41, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Vhhhhjhgy (talk) 07:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)