Talk:Andorra at the 2014 Winter Paralympics/GA1
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Courcelles in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 18:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Typo: Fernandex |
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
|
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
|
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | |
|
|
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
|
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
Flag rationale is fine. |
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
I also found no free images |
|
|
7. Overall assessment. | |
Well I think you can gather why he did not finish the race, you might be able to cite the youtube video and say he fell and slid down the hill or something? Should at least be an external link. Kees08 (Talk) 06:52, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Since the IPC posted it there, I'm fine with citing it. Done, and typo fixed, Kees08, thanks for the review! Courcelles (talk) 13:00, 10 May 2018 (UTC)